At a glance
The breakdown of card networks (Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Discover, Diners, JCB) and payment types (card vs eCheck.Net ACH) by transaction count and volume share. Reveals which network drives the merchant’s revenue and where interchange-optimisation gains hide.
| What it counts | GROUP BY accountType + cardType (Visa / Mastercard / Amex / Discover / Diners / JCB / eCheck) for transactionStatus = settledSuccessfully, ordered by share. |
| API endpoint | getTransactionListRequest, with the cardType field. |
| Currency | Currency-neutral by count; per-currency by volume. |
| Refunds | Excluded. |
| Disputes | Excluded. |
| eCheck.Net (ACH) | Counted as a separate “method” (not a card network); typically 3 to 15% share for B2B-heavy merchants, near zero for pure-B2C. |
| Apple Pay / Google Pay | These are encrypted-tokenised card transactions; tokens decrypt to underlying network (Visa, Mastercard, etc.) and count under the underlying network. |
| Authorize.Net Visa Click to Pay (formerly Visa Checkout) | Tagged as Visa with a Click to Pay flag; counted under Visa. |
| Time window | 30D. |
| Roles | owner, finance |
Calculation
Calculated automatically from your Authorize.net data. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.Worked example
“Heartland Hardware Co.”, 30 days ending 02 May 26.| Network / Method | Count | Volume | AOV | Volume share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visa | 1,420 | USD 698,400 | USD 491.83 | 37.4% |
| Mastercard | 884 | USD 412,200 | USD 466.29 | 22.1% |
| American Express | 392 | USD 482,800 | USD 1,231.63 | 25.9% |
| Discover | 154 | USD 78,400 | USD 509.09 | 4.2% |
| eCheck.Net (ACH) | 98 | USD 184,200 | USD 1,879.59 | 9.9% |
| Diners / JCB | 16 | USD 9,800 | USD 612.50 | 0.5% |
| Total | 2,964 | USD 1,865,800 | USD 629.49 | 100% |
- Amex 25.9% volume share on 13.2% transaction count. Amex skews high-AOV B2B (USD 1,232 AOV vs USD 491 on Visa). Amex interchange is materially higher (typically 2.5 to 3.5% vs Visa’s 1.7 to 2.2%), so Amex traffic costs more per dollar processed. CFO calculation: 25.9% of volume at +1pp interchange = roughly USD 4,800/month “Amex tax” vs an all-Visa world.
- eCheck.Net (ACH) at 9.9% volume share on AOV USD 1,880. ACH is the cheapest rail (typically USD 0.30 to 1.00 per transaction flat, no percentage) but slowest (3 to 5 day settlement). Heartland’s B2B portal customers prefer ACH for large orders; growing this from 10% to 20% of volume saves roughly USD 2,000/month in interchange.
- Visa + Mastercard combined 59.5% volume. The “core” rail. Decline-rate, success-rate, AVS-mismatch, and 3DS performance optimisation efforts should focus here for maximum impact.
- Discover at 4.2%. Discover-issued cards are heavily US-domestic; share is roughly the network’s US market share. Underperformance suggests merchant is outside Discover’s target demographic; over-performance suggests strong loyalty-program tie-ins.
- Diners / JCB at 0.5%. Tail networks; almost certainly Asia-pacific tourist orders. Don’t chase optimisation here.
Sibling cards merchants should reference together
| Card | Why pair it with Top Payment Methods |
|---|---|
aut_total_volume | The total being broken down. |
aut_avg_transaction | AOV by network reveals customer-segment gaps. |
aut_decline_rate | Network-specific decline patterns. |
aut_chargeback_rate | Amex chargebacks behave differently from Visa/MC. |
Stripe stripe_top_payment_methods | Cross-PSP comparison. |
Reconciling against the vendor’s own dashboard
Where to look in the Authorize.Net Dashboard: account.authorize.net → Reports → Transaction Statistics with grouping by Card Type. Or Reports → Settled Transactions with CSV export and pivot. Why our number may differ:| Reason | Direction | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Pay / Google Pay attribution | We attribute under underlying network; Dashboard sometimes shows as separate row | Affects Visa / Mastercard counts upward in our view. |
| Time zone | Boundary days off | Pacific batch cut-off vs UTC. |
| Comparison | Expected | Why |
|---|---|---|
aut_top_payment_methods ↔ commerce-platform payment-method breakdown | Different namespaces | Commerce shows “Authorize.Net” as one row; this card splits within it. |
Known limitations / merchant FAQs
Why is Amex so over-represented in volume but under in count? Amex cardholders index higher on premium and B2B spend. Amex commercial cards (corporate purchasing cards) are over-indexed in B2B distribution. The classic ratio is 12 to 18% count, 22 to 30% volume. If the merchant’s B2B portal is heavily commercial-card-driven, Amex AOV runs 2 to 3x the blended. Should I drop Amex to reduce interchange? Rarely a good idea. Amex cardholders have higher disposable income and B2B purchasing-card status. Dropping Amex typically loses 15 to 25% of revenue from those customers (they often don’t carry a backup card on their corporate purchasing accounts). Better strategy: ensure Level 2 / Level 3 data submission to drop Amex commercial-card interchange by 50 to 100bps. eCheck.Net (ACH) growing share, good or bad? Generally good for B2B (cheaper, larger transactions, lower chargeback risk). Bad for B2C (slow settlement, higher return risk). Watch the ACH return rate (NACHA codes); above 1% return rate signals quality issues with the customer base. Apple Pay / Google Pay, where do they show? Under the underlying network. An Apple-Pay-tokenised Visa transaction shows as Visa. The wallet itself doesn’t get a separate row in this card. Discover plus Diners is strange, are they the same? Discover bought Diners Club and JCB has a partnership with Discover for US acceptance. They’re processed through similar acquirer rails but different network IDs. We split them bycardType field; Diners and JCB are typically tail volume.
Visa Click to Pay (Visa-owned, recently rebranded from Visa Checkout) on Authorize.Net?
Yes, Authorize.Net supports Visa Click to Pay with the clickToPay integration. Volume counts under Visa. Click to Pay reduces friction and lifts conversion 5 to 12% on supported devices.
B2B purchasing card, how to spot?
Authorize.Net returns a cardCode flag indicating commercial vs consumer; B2B purchasing cards are flagged. Heartland Hardware’s commercial-card share runs roughly 35 to 45% on the B2B portal. Track separately for interchange-optimisation focus.