Share of accounts receivable balance aged 60+ days. The cash-at-risk early warning that tells you which money you are owed may never arrive.
At a glance
The percentage of your total open accounts receivable balance that has aged 60 or more days past invoice date. This is the cash-at-risk number: once a B2B invoice crosses 60 days it is statistically far less likely to be collected in full, and every day beyond that the probability falls further. A high or rising 60+ share is the earliest reliable signal that working capital is silently leaking into uncollectable receivables. The card reads the AR sub-ledger by aging bucket and surfaces the 60+ slice as a single governable number, dimension-tagged in Sage Intacct so finance can pivot the at-risk cohort by Customer, Class, Department, or Entity and route each collection conversation to the right owner.
| What it counts | The 60+ day aged portion of open AR, expressed as a percentage of total open AR. The card reads the AR sub-ledger (open Invoices, Invoice Lines, and applied receipts) and ages each open balance against its invoice or due date per the aging policy, then divides the 60+ bucket by the total open AR balance. |
| Aging basis | Invoice date by default. Configurable per workspace to age from due date instead, which credits the agreed payment term (Net-30, Net-60) before counting an invoice as overdue. |
| Bucket definition | 60+ means the 61-90, 91-120, and 120+ buckets combined. The card respects the bucket boundaries set in the Intacct AR aging configuration. |
| Credits and deposits | Customer credit memos and unapplied receipts net against the open balance in their buckets, so a large unapplied deposit can pull the percentage down without any genuine collection. |
| Currency | Multi-Entity Console: each entity’s AR aged in base currency, the percentage computed per entity and at the consolidated level in reporting currency at the configured FX cadence. |
| Entity scope | Card respects the dashboard entity filter. |
| Dimensional cut | Each aged dollar carries Intacct dimensions through. Pivot by Customer to see who owes you the at-risk money, by Class to see which brand or channel the bad debt concentrates in, by Department to see which sales team’s accounts are slipping. |
| Time window | 30D vs prior |
| Alert trigger | >15% of AR in the 60+ bucket, sentiment ar_aging. Configurable per workspace. Healthy B2B operations often run under 10%; readings above 15% usually mean collections has fallen behind or a major account is in trouble. |
| Roles | owner, finance |
Calculation
Calculated automatically from your Sage data. The card divides the AR sub-ledger balance in the 60+ aging buckets by the total open AR balance and expresses it as a percentage. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.Worked example
A US B2B supplements brand on Sage Intacct, single entity, USD base currency, roughly 28M USD annual revenue selling wholesale through a BigCommerce B2B portal on Net-30 and Net-60 terms to independent retailers and a handful of large chain accounts. Snapshot 14 Apr 26. Aging basis set to invoice date. Total open AR on the day is 4,260,000 USD.| Aging bucket | Open AR (USD) | Share of total AR |
|---|---|---|
| 0-30 days | 2,940,000 | 69% |
| 31-60 days | 554,000 | 13% |
| 61-90 days | 383,000 | 9% |
| 91-120 days | 213,000 | 5% |
| 120+ days | 170,000 | 4% |
| AR Aging 60+ Days (this card) | 766,000 | 18% |
- 18% is above the 15% alert line, and on a 28M USD business that is 766,000 USD of receivables that should already be ringing alarms. This card is a Hero for a reason: of every working-capital metric, the 60+ AR share is the one most predictive of an actual cash shortfall a quarter from now. The arithmetic is blunt. Collection probability drops sharply past 60 days, falls hard past 90, and approaches write-off territory past 120. The 383,000 USD in the 61-90 bucket is still very collectable with active chasing; the 170,000 USD in 120+ is the cohort where finance should already be modelling a bad-debt provision.
- The 30D vs prior trend is the part that turns a number into a decision. On this account the 60+ share climbed from 12% to 18% in a single month, a 6-point deterioration. That is not noise; it is collections losing ground. Pivot the 60+ cohort by Customer and the story usually concentrates: here, 60% of the increase traced to two chain accounts that had both quietly stretched from Net-30 to paying at 75 days. The Customer dimension cut surfaced exactly which accounts, so the credit controller could open those two specific conversations rather than chasing the whole ledger.
- The 120+ bucket is where you stop chasing and start provisioning. The 170,000 USD aged past 120 days on this account is the cohort the auditor will ask about at year-end. Best practice is to review each 120+ balance, decide collectable vs doubtful, and book a bad-debt provision for the doubtful portion through a journal in Intacct rather than carrying it at full value and taking a sudden hit later. Surfacing this cohort six months before the audit is the difference between an orderly provision and an embarrassing year-end surprise.
- Read this card against DSO, not instead of it. Days Sales Outstanding is the average; the 60+ aging share is the tail. A business can have a perfectly respectable average DSO of 38 days while still carrying a dangerous 60+ tail concentrated in a few accounts, because the average hides the distribution. The two cards together tell you both how fast you collect on average and how much of your AR is genuinely at risk. When the DSO Increase Alert fires, this card tells you whether the deterioration is broad or concentrated.
- The cross-channel signal is the killer: aged AR on customers who are still placing new orders. Pair this card with AR Aging on Customers with Active Ecom Orders. On this account the join surfaced one chain that owed 96,000 USD aged past 90 days while continuing to place fresh wholesale orders through the BigCommerce B2B portal every week, because no credit hold had been applied. That is a customer being extended more credit precisely as their existing balance goes bad. Intacct alone shows the aged AR; the commerce platform alone shows the new orders; only the cross-connector join shows the contradiction, and it usually pays for the subscription on the first finding.
Sibling cards merchants should reference together
| Card | Why pair it with AR Aging 60+ Days |
|---|---|
| AR Balance (live) | The denominator. The aging share is meaningless without the live total it is a slice of. |
| Days Sales Outstanding | The average to this card’s tail. Read both: speed and risk are different questions. |
| DSO Increase Alert | The trigger. When DSO jumps, this card tells you whether the cause is broad or concentrated. |
| Overdue Invoice Value | The absolute dollar exposure behind the percentage. |
| High-Value Overdue Invoices | The named-and-shamed list: the specific large invoices driving the 60+ tail. |
| AR Aging Detail | The full bucket breakdown this card summarises into a single 60+ slice. |
| AR Aging on Customers with Active Ecom Orders | The cross-channel kill-shot: bad debt on customers still being sold to. |
| Customer Credit Utilisation | Aged AR plus maxed credit limit is the classic pre-default profile. |
Reconciling against Sage
Where to look in Sage: The native Sage Intacct views to run side by side with this card:Reports → Accounts Receivable → AR Aging Report (the canonical aged-receivables breakdown by bucket, run as of the snapshot date) Reports → Accounts Receivable → AR Aging Detail (line-level Invoices behind each bucket, the chase list) Reports → Accounts Receivable → Customer Aging (the same aging pivoted by Customer, the cohort this card drills into) Reports → Accounts Receivable → AR Ledger (the underlying open-Invoice and applied-receipt detail) Interactive Custom Report (ICR) built on the AR data source, aging open Invoices into buckets and computing the 60+ slice as a percentage of total open AR, pivoted by Customer and Class dimensionsThe AR Aging Report typically ages from invoice date by default; confirm whether your board pack and any bad-debt provision calculations use invoice-date or due-date aging, because the two produce materially different 60+ percentages on a portfolio with long terms. For Multi-Entity Console accounts, run Reports → Accounts Receivable → AR Aging by Entity at the same scope as the dashboard filter so FX does not shift the reporting-currency value of remote-entity receivables between runs. Common reconciliation pitfalls:
- Aging “as of” date. The AR Aging Report ages as of the run date. Compare it to the card at the same snapshot date or the populations will differ purely on timing.
- Unapplied cash receipts. A customer payment received but not yet applied to specific Invoices reduces the customer balance but may leave Invoices showing open in detail. This makes the card and a detail report disagree until application completes. The fix is the same as raising your Cash Application Rate.
- Disputed invoices. An Invoice flagged in dispute still ages. Some board packs carve disputed Invoices out of the at-risk count; the card includes them unless the field map says otherwise.
| Reason | Direction | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Aging basis | Either | Invoice-date vs due-date aging. Card defaults to invoice date (strict); due-date aging credits Net-30 and Net-60 terms and reads lower. |
| As-of date | Either | Card snapshots at the dashboard date; a report run at month-end ages a different population. |
| Unapplied receipts | Card may overstate | Cash received but not yet applied leaves Invoices open in detail; a low Cash Application Rate inflates the aged count. |
| Credit memo netting | Card may understate | Unapplied customer credits net against the balance, pulling the 60+ percentage down without collection. |
| Disputed invoices | Card may overstate | Disputed Invoices still age; some packs exclude them from the at-risk number. |
| Deferred-revenue invoices | Either | Invoices tied to ASC 606 deferred schedules can show open AR even where revenue is not yet recognised. |
| FX cadence per entity | Small | Multi-Entity Console: card uses current-day FX, Intacct reports may use period-end. Differences usually under 2%. |
| Write-offs in progress | Card may overstate | A balance approved for write-off but not yet posted still ages until the journal lands. |
| Card | Expected relationship | What the comparison reveals |
|---|---|---|
| AR Aging on Customers with Active Ecom Orders | Killer cross-channel | Aged AR on a customer still placing orders means they are being extended more credit as their balance goes bad. The single highest-value finding in this family. |
| Customer Credit Utilisation | Compounding | A customer in the 60+ cohort who is also near their credit limit is a pre-default profile. Hold orders before the next shipment. |
| Orders on Credit Hold | Control loop | This card surfaces who should be on hold; the credit-hold card confirms whether the control actually fired. |
| Days Sales Outstanding | Average vs tail | DSO is the average, this card is the dangerous tail. Together they describe the full distribution. |
| Sage Health Score | Component | The 60+ AR share is one of the heaviest-weighted working-capital inputs to the composite. |