Skip to main content
Metrics type: Supporting MetricsCategory: Payment Gateway

At a glance

The total dollar amount refunded through Recharge in the period: customer-cancellation goodwill refunds, quality / defect refunds, late-shipment make-goods, retroactive promotion adjustments. The dollar-value complement of rec_refund_rate and the figure to subtract from rec_total_volume for a net-of-refunds reading.

Calculation

Calculated automatically from your Recharge data. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.

Worked example

“Daily Greens Co”. 30-day window 03 Apr 26 to 02 May 26.
What the merchant should notice:
  1. Refund volume USD 22,124 is the figure to subtract from gross to get net-of-refunds. Many CFOs read the gross volume card and forget refunds; this card is the bridge.
  2. Cancellation goodwill (USD 14,540) is the bulk. Reducing it requires cancel-flow improvements (offer pause, skip, downgrade before refund) not refund-policy tightening.
  3. The original Recharge platform fee + processor fee on USD 22,124 is non-refundable. At a blended ~3% on the original charges, that’s ~USD 660 of merchant cost the brand absorbs even when refunding the customer. Heavy refund volume erodes margin disproportionately.
  4. Late-shipment make-goods at USD 1,738 are a 4PL signal. If this category grows multi-week, the warehouse / carrier needs review.
  5. Promotional retroactive refunds (USD 2,212) are operational waste. Restructure as next-rebill discounts to eliminate the refund operation.

Sibling cards merchants should reference together

Reconciling against the vendor’s own dashboard

Where to look in the Recharge merchant portal: admin.rechargepayments.com. The closest comparable view is Recharge Admin → Charges → Refunded with date range; the running total at the top equals this card. Why our number may legitimately differ: Cross-connector reconciliation:

Known limitations / merchant FAQs

“Refund volume jumped, what to check first?” A fulfilment cohort issue (delayed batch, defective product), a marketing-driven retroactive promotional refund cluster, or a customer-portal swap bug producing duplicate-charge corrections. Cross-reference with rec_refund_rate reason groupings. “Why does my bank deposit not equal gross_volume - refund_volume?” Three deductions: (1) Recharge platform fee, (2) underlying processor fee, (3) the original processor fee on the refunded amount is typically NOT recovered (Stripe / Shopify Payments still take their fee on the original charge). So bank-deposited ≈ (gross - refund) - all_fees - non_recovered_processor_fee. “Partial refunds, do they count proportionally?” Yes. A USD 30 refund on a USD 79 charge contributes USD 30 to this card. “Multi-currency refund total, can I see one rolled-up number?” Not on this card. Use Recharge admin’s “Convert to store currency” toggle in the Refunded view for FX-rolled USD equivalent. “Recharge fee on refunds, is there one?” No platform fee from Recharge for issuing a refund. The cost is the non-recoverable original processor fee. “Why are duplicate-charge corrections in here?” When a customer-portal swap produces an unintended double-bill, CS reverses one of the charges. It’s a refund operation in the data even though it’s effectively a correction. Filter by reason code in Recharge admin to isolate.

Tracked live in Vortex IQ Nerve Centre

Refund Volume is one of hundreds of KPI pulses Vortex IQ tracks across Recharge and 70+ other ecommerce connectors. Nerve Centre runs the detection layer; Vortex Mind investigates the cause when something moves; Ask Viq lets you interrogate any number in plain English. Start for free or book a demo to see this metric running on your own data.