At a glance
Head-to-head average cost per parcel, Bring against PostNord, broken down by Nordic destination country. This is a cross-platform card: it joins your Bring connector to your PostNord connector and lays the two carriers side by side so you can see, per destination, which one you should be defaulting to. The usual pattern in the data is that Bring wins on Norway-domestic (its home network) while PostNord often beats Bring on cross-Nordic lanes into Sweden and Denmark (their home networks). The card surfaces the gap so a carrier-routing decision is made on evidence, not habit.
Calculation
Calculated automatically from your Bring and PostNord data. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.Worked example
A Norwegian fashion brand based in Oslo running a dual-carrier strategy, around 6,200 outbound parcels per week across the Nordics, split roughly Bring 60 percent / PostNord 40 percent by habit rather than by lane economics. Reading taken at 09:00 CET on 14 Apr 26 for the trailing 30 days (15 Mar 26 to 13 Apr 26), compared with the previous 30 days.
The alert fires on Sweden: Bring is 14.0 percent above PostNord, past the 10 percent line. Five things to notice:
- Norway is Bring’s lane, decisively. Bring is 15.2 percent cheaper domestically (78 NOK vs 92 NOK) on its home network. Yet this merchant still routes 2,100 domestic parcels a month through PostNord out of habit. Moving those to Bring saves roughly 14 NOK each, about 29,000 NOK a month on the domestic lane alone.
- Sweden is the alert, and it is the inverse problem. PostNord wins Sweden by 14 percent (their home network), but the merchant pushes 3,800 parcels a month through Bring there. That gap is the largest single piece of margin at risk: re-routing the Swedish volume to PostNord saves roughly 17 NOK each, about 65,000 NOK a month.
- Denmark is genuinely close. A 3.9 percent gap is inside the noise of surcharge timing and service-tier mix. Denmark can be routed on reliability or capacity rather than price; check On-Time Delivery Rate against the PostNord OTD for the deciding factor.
- Cost is only half the decision. A cheaper carrier that misses delivery is not cheaper once you count refunds and WISMO tickets. Always pair this table with the OTD comparison: the right default is the carrier that wins on cost and holds on reliability for that lane.
- The period-over-period column is the early warning. If a carrier revises a fuel or remote-area surcharge, the gap moves and a lane that was a draw last month becomes an alert this month. Watch the vsP delta, not just the level, so a price change does not quietly flip your best default.
Sibling cards merchants should reference together
Cost-per-country only becomes a routing decision when paired with reliability and the lanes underneath. Pair it with these:Reconciling against the source
Where to look in each carrier’s own portal: For the Bring side, Mybring → Invoices and Statistics → Cost carries the reconciled net price and surcharges per consignment and per destination. For the PostNord side, the PostNord business portal (PostNord Portal / Skicka Direkt for the business account) carries the equivalent shipment-cost and invoice lines. This card lays the two next to each other; reconcile each carrier against its own portal first, then trust the comparison. The closest like-for-like view is Residential Parcel, by Destination Country, Last 30 Days, Net Price including surcharges, run separately in each carrier’s portal. Why our number may legitimately differ from the carrier portals:
Cross-connector reconciliation: