At a glance
Pacing check on MediaMath budgets. Important MediaMath caveat (May 26): post-restructure platform billing has occasionally produced delayed-batch artefacts that distort intra-period pacing. If pacing reads materially different from what T1 UI shows, suspect a billing-batch event before assuming campaign-level overspend.
Calculation
Calculated automatically from your MediaMath data. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.Worked example
The same enterprise homeware brand. Period 01 Apr 26 to 30 Apr 26. Today 18 Apr 26 (60% elapsed).
What’s interesting:
- Account at 69% pacing vs 60% elapsed = mild overpacing (9pp ahead). Within healthy band. The CTV NBA playoffs effect is the main driver.
- CTV at 71% pacing is the campaign-level alert. Same NBA-driven CPM rise we’d expect on TTD or DV360; not MediaMath-specific. Action: monitor through end of playoffs (~21 Apr 26) and either accept the seasonal premium or cap the daily spend if budget needs to last.
- Reconciliation check: the $72,200 here should match T1 UI’s spend figure. If it does not, do not assume the card is wrong; on MediaMath specifically, billing-batch artefacts can cause the T1 UI itself to misreport intermittently. Reconcile both against your own monthly invoice for the canonical figure.
- The 30D prior had pacing 64% at 60% elapsed, slightly tighter. This window’s 69% pacing is the alert but at the low end of “investigate”; not the kind of alert that demands immediate action.
- If you’re running TTD in parallel during migration evaluation, compare cross-DSP pacing. If TTD is well-paced and MediaMath is overpaced on similar inventory, the MediaMath Brain bidding may be ramping more aggressively than Koa; a campaign-config issue rather than a market issue.
- Pacing ≈ time-elapsed ± 5pp = healthy.
- Pacing > time-elapsed by 10, 20pp = mild overpacing; usually Brain ramping or seasonal CPM.
- Pacing > time-elapsed by 30+pp = something accelerated sharply OR a billing-batch artefact; reconcile to T1 UI before throttling.
- Pacing < time-elapsed by 15+pp = underspending; Brain failing to find inventory at your bid; raise CPM or expand audience.
- Account-level pacing reads different from sum of T1 campaign pacing = post-restructure batch issue; investigate before acting.
Sibling cards merchants should reference together
Reconciling against the vendor’s own dashboard
Where to look in MediaMath T1: T1 → Campaigns → per-campaign budget and pacing column. T1 also surfaces a campaign-level pacing indicator. The account-level total in this card sums per-campaign budgets and per-campaign spend. Why our number may legitimately differ from T1:
Cross-connector reconciliation: