Total $ leaked through soft declines that alternate-funding-source prompts / dunning could recover next month.
At a glance
Dollar value of PayPal soft-decline revenue from the trailing 30 days that you could realistically recover next month with dunning, alternate-funding-source prompts, or simple checkout improvements. The “money on the table” view, isolating recoverable declines (insufficient_funds, payer_authentication_required, network_error) from hard declines (instrument_declined, expired_card, denied_by_risk).
Calculation
Calculated automatically from your PayPal data. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.Worked example
A US-based subscription beauty brand running PayPal Express. 30-day window: 14 Mar 26 to 12 Apr 26. PayPal carries the higher-risk traffic mix. Total T00 declined value over the window: $42,840 Breakdown bytransaction_subject:
- 5k alert. At industry-standard recovery rates (25-40% of soft declines), this merchant could realistically capture 11,500 of additional monthly revenue with disciplined dunning + checkout improvements. That’s a six-figure annual lift.
- **
insufficient_fundsis the largest soft-decline bucket (4,000-$5,700/month. - **
payer_authentication_requiredis 3,500-$6,000/month. - **
network_erroris 2,000-$2,500/month, mostly automatic. - The hard-loss subset ($13,480) is NOT in this card’s headline. Those declines are real customer-side problems (card has issue, PayPal Risk caught fraud) and aren’t recoverable through dunning or UX changes. Pretending they’re recoverable would mis-target the operations team.
- The recovery isn’t immediate, it’s “next month-ish”. This card is a forecast of what could be recovered with sustained effort over the next 30-60 days. It’s not the live revenue-at-risk view (that’s PP Revenue at Risk (live)). Treat it as a strategic budget input: how much should I invest in dunning ops next quarter?
Sibling cards merchants should reference together
Reconciling against the vendor’s own dashboard
Where to look in PayPal Business: PayPal Business does NOT offer a native “recoverable revenue” calculation; this is a Vortex IQ-derived classification on top of PayPal’s decline data. The closest PayPal-side views for cross-checking:- PayPal Business → Reports → Activity download, CSV export of declined transactions over the same window. Filter by Status = “Denied” + “Failed”, group by Subject for a hand-tally of soft vs hard categories.
- PayPal Business → Activity → All Transactions, same filter, drill into individual rows to verify subject classification.
- PayPal Business → Notifications for individual decline emails (per-transaction).
- “Lost transactions” tile in PayPal Business is all declines, not the recoverable subset.
- “Revenue forecasting” reports (where available) project successful revenue trends, not decline-driven recovery.
- Some third-party dunning tools surface “recoverable revenue” but use proprietary classifications; their numbers won’t match ours unless they use the same subject taxonomy.
Cross-connector reconciliation:
This card is Vortex IQ-derived. PayPal does not publish a recoverable-revenue forecast; the soft vs hard classification is proprietary to Vortex IQ but maps directly onto PayPal’s
transaction_subject taxonomy.
Known limitations / merchant FAQs
Is this number “guaranteed recoverable” or “potentially recoverable”? Potentially. The headline is the recoverable pool, the soft-decline value that disciplined operations could capture. Actual recovery depends on your dunning sophistication, retry timing, and customer-side circumstances. Industry benchmarks suggest 25-40% of insufficient_funds is recoverable; 30-50% of 3DS abandons; 60-80% of network errors. Use PP Retry Success Rate to calibrate against your actual experience. Why doesn’tdenied_by_risk count as recoverable?
Because PayPal Risk usually catches real fraud or marginal cases that should be declined. Recovering a denied_by_risk decline often means recovering revenue from a fraudster, which then becomes a chargeback in 30-60 days, costing you the order value PLUS a chargeback fee PLUS counting toward your 1.0% Visa cap. False positives exist (legitimate customers getting risk-flagged), but tuning PayPal Risk settings is the answer there, not retry / dunning.
What’s the practical operations playbook to capture this revenue?
Three projects in priority order:
- Insufficient_funds dunning ($14,260 in our worked example): set up a 3-attempt retry schedule (T+1, T+3, T+7 days). Use PayPal’s
/v1/payments/paymentendpoint to re-attempt; pair with email reminder sequence (“we tried again, your payment didn’t go through”). Expected lift: 30-40% of pool. - 3DS abandon recovery ($11,920 in worked example): offer Apple Pay and Google Pay as wallet-funded alternatives at the PayPal-decline page. First-time wallet-funded transactions skip 3DS challenges. Expected lift: 30-50% of pool.
- Network error retry ($3,180 in worked example): automatic single-retry within 30 seconds on
network_errorresponses. Almost zero customer-facing change. Expected lift: 60-80% of pool.
expired_card recoverable, even with PayPal’s account-update service?
PayPal does have a card-account-update programme (Visa Account Updater, Mastercard Automatic Billing Updater) that can refresh expired cards without customer action, but it’s only available to merchants who explicitly enable it and pay for it. Without that programme, expired_card requires the customer to log into PayPal and update their funding source, which is a customer-initiated recovery that doesn’t fit the “merchant operations recovery” framing of this card. If you have the account-update programme enabled, you can move expired_card from hard-loss to recoverable on this card via a manifest tweak.
Stripe’s twin shows higher recoverable revenue than mine, am I underperforming?
Or you have a healthier traffic mix. PayPal carries more 3DS-abandoning international shoppers and bank-funded buyers; Stripe carries more card-on-file desktop shoppers. Stripe’s card_declined bucket is often a different shape than PayPal’s instrument_declined. The two pools are not directly comparable; what matters is your store’s direction over time. Rising recoverable pool means declining customer experience or rising adverse-traffic mix.