At a glance
Sum of spend on StackAdapt campaigns that recorded zero conversions across the entire window. Campaign-level twin of Wasted Spend (which is placement-level). A whole campaign with zero conversions is a bigger problem than a bad placement; it usually means goal, audience, pixel, or creative are fundamentally misaligned. Excludes campaigns younger than 7 days to avoid penalising still-learning BidCore runs.
Calculation
Calculated automatically from your StackAdapt data. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.Worked example
The same US homeware brand. Window 02 Apr 26 to 01 May 26.
What’s interesting:
- CTV “Outdoor Living” test ($1,400) is the bigger problem. 18 days, no conversions on a CTV view-through campaign suggests one of: (a) view-through window set to 1-day instead of 7 (a classic config error on test campaigns); (b) the conversion pixel isn’t tracking the right event; (c) the audience targeting is genuinely wrong. Action: check view-through window first (5-minute fix), then pixel config, then audience. Pause as last resort.
- Programmatic Audio test ($620) at 14 days zero-conv is borderline. Audio is structurally hard to attribute (no clicks; the user heard the ad while driving and bought a week later via Branded Search). The campaign may be working but credit is going to other channels. Action: check if Branded Search volumes ramped during the audio campaign window; if yes, the campaign is incremental despite zero StackAdapt-attributed conversions; classify as awareness and continue. If no, pause.
- The new Display Test (4 days old) is excluded by design. BidCore needs 7+ days to exit learning phase; flagging earlier creates noise.
- 4.6% zero-conv spend is on the borderline of healthy. Healthy DSP runs 2, 5%; 4.6% is at the upper end. Fixing the CTV view-through config alone would drop it to 1.4%, well within healthy.
- Don’t confuse this card with Wasted Spend. That one is placement-level; this one is campaign-level. The two should be read together: a healthy campaign can have wasted placements; a zero-conv campaign has structural issues.
- One campaign zero-conv with high impressions = pixel/goal misconfig OR audience mismatch.
- Multiple campaigns zero-conv simultaneously = global tracking outage; check pixel sitewide.
- CTV campaign zero-conv = check view-through window first (1d vs 7d) before anything else.
- Audio campaign zero-conv with rising Branded Search = working but incremental, not direct.
- Zero-conv campaign older than 30 days = past learning, no signal; pause and restructure.
Sibling cards merchants should reference together
Reconciling against the vendor’s own dashboard
Where to look in StackAdapt: StackAdapt → Reports → Campaigns, sort by Conversions ascending. Campaigns with zero conversions and >7 days of activity are the action set. StackAdapt does not surface “zero-conversion spend” as a single number; this card derives it. Why our number may legitimately differ from a manual cut:
Cross-connector reconciliation: