Skip to main content
Card class: Non-HeroCategory: Payment Gateway

At a glance

Mix of payment methods used in Viva Payments transactions in the period, by share of revenue or transaction count. Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Maestro, Apple Pay, Google Pay, IRIS (Greek instant payment), Bancontact (Belgium), iDEAL (NL), Klarna, and Viva Wallet balance.
What it countsGROUP BY PaymentMethod COUNT(transactions WHERE StatusId = F) and the equivalent SUM by Amount. Pie / donut by share.
API endpoint/api/transactions with BrandId and PaymentSource fields.
Methods coveredCard brands (Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Maestro, Diners, Discover, Visa Electron, JCB, Union Pay, Cartes Bancaires); wallets (Apple Pay, Google Pay, Viva Wallet); local schemes (IRIS Greece, Bancontact Belgium, iDEAL Netherlands, Multibanco Portugal, BLIK Poland, Klarna BNPL, Trustly bank-direct).
CurrencyCurrency-neutral when expressed as % share. Per-currency views available via filter.
Refunds / disputesExcluded (only successful captures count).
Failed paymentsExcluded.
3DS treatmentBoth frictionless and challenge-completed contribute.
Time window30D vsP.
Alert trigger+10pp shift in any single method’s share vs prior period.
Rolesowner, marketing

Calculation

Calculated automatically from your Viva Payments data. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.

Worked example

A pan-EU DTC brand (“Aegean Honey”) on Smart Checkout with multiple local methods enabled. Window 03 Apr 26 to 02 May 26.
MethodShare of transactionsShare of revenue
Visa (debit + credit)38%36%
Mastercard (debit + credit)31%29%
Apple Pay12%14%
IRIS (Greek instant)6%5%
Google Pay4%5%
iDEAL (NL customers)3%4%
Bancontact (BE customers)2%3%
Amex2%3%
Klarna BNPL1%1%
Maestro / other1%<1%
What the merchant should notice:
  1. Apple Pay’s revenue share (14%) is higher than transaction share (12%). This is normal, Apple Pay users tend to be wealthier demographics with larger basket sizes. If you see Apple Pay rising, that’s a leading indicator of a higher-AOV cohort.
  2. IRIS share at 5, 6% is real and growing. IRIS is Greece’s instant-payment scheme (account-to-account, no card network involved). It’s growing 30, 40% year-over-year as Greek consumers adopt it. Critically, IRIS has effectively zero interchange (it’s bank-direct), so a 5pp shift from card to IRIS materially improves your blended fee rate.
  3. Local methods (iDEAL, Bancontact, Multibanco) cover specific countries. A NL customer paying with iDEAL pays via bank transfer with no card-scheme fees; merchants enabling iDEAL typically see 30, 50% iDEAL share among NL customers.
  4. Klarna BNPL share at 1% is low but growing. If your AOV is < EUR 50, BNPL adoption stays low. Above EUR 100 AOV (furniture, electronics), BNPL can hit 8, 15% of share.
  5. Why no PayPal? PayPal isn’t routed through Viva, customers paying with PayPal in your checkout go through your PayPal Business connector. They show up in paypal.pp_payment_methods, not here.

Sibling cards merchants should reference together

CardWhy pair it with Payment Methods
viv_top_payment_methodsSister card with same view, different threshold.
viva_total_revenueMethod-mix shifts move revenue total, especially when high-AOV methods (Amex, Apple Pay) shift.
viva_avg_transactionAvg transaction is sensitive to method mix.
viva_decline_rateMethod mix affects decline (Amex declines more than debit on EU traffic).
viva_revenue_by_countryCountry mix drives method mix (NL → iDEAL, BE → Bancontact, GR → IRIS).
Stripe stripe_payment_method_mix / PayPal pp_payment_methodsCross-PSP comparison.

Reconciling against the vendor’s own dashboard

Where to look in the Viva Payments Dashboard: viva.com/business/account/login. Closest comparable view:
Viva Business → Sales → Reports → Payment Methods (or By Brand for card brand split)
Other relevant views:
  • Smart Checkout configuration (Settings → Channels → Smart Checkout): which methods are enabled, vs which are actually used (this card).
  • Risk view: per-method decline rates.
Why our number may legitimately differ from the Viva Dashboard:
ReasonDirectionWhy
Time zoneBoundary days offAthens vs UTC.
Method groupingEitherViva’s “Card” group sometimes lumps brands; this card splits Visa / Mastercard / Amex separately.
Wallet routingApple Pay shows underlying cardA Visa-funded Apple Pay payment may show as either “Apple Pay” or “Visa” depending on aggregation; this card prefers the wallet label.
Cross-connector reconciliation:
ComparisonExpected relationshipWhen divergence is legitimate
viva_payment_methodsstripe.stripe_payment_method_mixIndependent (different rails)Multi-PSP merchants see different mixes per rail. Premium / Amex traffic often defaults to Stripe; local + IRIS to Viva.
viva_payment_methods ↔ commerce-platform method breakdownShould match for Viva-paid ordersCommerce-platform aggregate covers all gateways; Viva is a subset.

Known limitations / merchant FAQs

Why is IRIS only 5%? My competitors say theirs is 20%+. IRIS adoption depends heavily on (a) checkout positioning (top-of-list vs hidden under “more methods”), (b) icon recognition, and (c) the customer demographic (younger Greek customers adopt IRIS faster than over-50s). If your IRIS share is low, move IRIS up the checkout-method list and add the “instant, no-fee” badge. Many Greek merchants see IRIS rise to 15, 25% with these UX changes. Apple Pay underlying card, what gets recorded? This card prefers the wallet label (Apple Pay / Google Pay) over the underlying card brand. The underlying brand (e.g. “Visa”) is still in the raw BrandId field if you query the API directly. Why is my BNPL share so low? BNPL adoption correlates with AOV. Below EUR 50, BNPL stays at <2%. Above EUR 100, expect 5, 10%. Above EUR 200, can hit 15, 20% (electronics, furniture). Don’t expect BNPL to move the needle on small-basket commerce. Local methods (iDEAL, Bancontact), do I need to enable them? Yes, if you sell to NL or BE customers and don’t enable iDEAL / Bancontact, those customers see a card-only checkout, conversion drops 15, 25% in those countries. Enable everything Viva offers for the markets you sell into; disable nothing without measuring. Method mix shifted 5pp toward Apple Pay, what changed? Usually one of three: (a) you launched a campaign appealing to younger / iOS-heavy demographics, (b) checkout UX added a visible Apple Pay button, (c) iOS update made Apple Pay default in Safari. The shift is rarely random. Different methods, different Viva fees? Yes. Local rails (IRIS, iDEAL, Bancontact, BLIK) have low or zero scheme fees. Premium cards (Amex, World Elite) carry higher interchange. Method mix directly affects your blended fee rate. The Settlements view in Viva Dashboard shows fee detail per method. Multi-currency, does this card show per-currency breakdown? Default is blended. Per-currency filter in the Viva Dashboard. Cross-currency Apple Pay vs domestic IRIS, for example, won’t naturally separate without filtering. JP Morgan ownership, any change to method support? None. Method support continues under existing Viva product roadmap.

Tracked live in Vortex IQ Nerve Centre

Payment Methods is one of hundreds of KPI pulses Vortex IQ tracks across Viva Payments and 70+ other ecommerce connectors. Nerve Centre runs the detection layer; Vortex Mind investigates the cause when something moves; Ask Viq lets you interrogate any number in plain English. Start for free or book a demo to see this metric running on your own data.