Skip to main content
Card class: HeroCategory: Email Marketing
Marketing-Hub send volume. Audit HS03 fires when this collapses without a list-size reason.

At a glance

Total Marketing-Hub email send volume in the period. The headline send-cadence number; collapses without a corresponding list-size reason fire audit HS03. Pulled from EMAIL_EVENT.SENT events via /marketing/v3/emails.
What it countsCOUNT(distinct EMAIL_EVENT where event_type = 'SENT') across all Marketing-Hub email sends in the window. Includes campaign blasts, A/B test variants, and workflow-triggered emails (welcome series, nurture, lifecycle).
HubSpot Hub scopeMarketing Hub. Sales Hub one-to-one Sequences and Service Hub emails are excluded; they are tracked separately.
Definition of “sent”A SENT event fires the moment HubSpot’s mail server hands the message to the recipient’s MTA. Excludes pre-flight rejects (invalid syntax) but includes messages that hard-bounce post-send.
A/B test handlingBoth variants count. A test sent to 10,000 split 50/50 contributes 10,000 sends, not 5,000 + 5,000.
Workflow-triggered emailsIncluded. Welcome flows, lifecycle nurture, and abandonment automations all add to this count. To split, see Workflow Enrolment Volume.
Sequence sends (1-to-1)Excluded. Sales Hub Sequence sends are tracked through hs_email_engagement, not EMAIL_EVENT.
BouncesCounted as SENT (HubSpot fires SENT first, then BOUNCED). Use Delivery Rate to back out clean delivery.
Skipped recipientsExcluded. Contacts skipped due to suppression-list, unsubscribe, or low-engagement filtering never get a SENT event.
Currencyn/a (count).
Time window30D vsP (30 days vs prior 30 days).
Alert triggerdrop >15% MoM, drives sentiment_key: send_volume. Audit HS03 cross-fires when the drop has no corresponding list-size cause.
Rolesowner, marketing

Calculation

Calculated automatically from your HubSpot data. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.

Worked example

A B2B SaaS portal with 84,200 contacts running Marketing Hub Pro. The 30-day window is 14 Mar 26 to 12 Apr 26.
SourceSendsNotes
Monthly product newsletter (4 sends)162,40040,600 recipients × 4 sends
Spring webinar promotion (3 emails)28,2009,400 invited segment
Pricing-page revisit re-engagement12,800List-based segment, single send
Welcome workflow (5-step nurture)8,400New signups in window x 5
Customer onboarding workflow (3-step)1,650New customer cohort x 3
MQL handoff workflow (2-step)4,200MQLs created in window x 2
Quarterly customer-care newsletter4,800Customer-stage segment
Total this card222,450
Compared with the prior 30 days (12 Feb 26 to 13 Mar 26):
PeriodSendsDelta
14 Mar 26 to 12 Apr 26222,450+16.8%
12 Feb 26 to 13 Mar 26190,400(baseline)
Year ago (14 Mar 25 to 12 Apr 25)142,800+55.8% YoY
Five things this picture reveals:
  1. 73% of sends come from two sources, the monthly newsletter (162,400) and the webinar campaign (28,200). Workflow sends are 14,250 (6.4%). For a Marketing-Hub-mature portal the workflow share should be 25-40%; this team is over-reliant on broadcast newsletters.
  2. The 16.8% MoM growth is healthy and consistent with list growth. Audit HS03 only fires when sends drop >15% with no list-size reason. Here the trend is up and the list is growing, no audit fires.
  3. YoY growth of 55.8% reflects scaling, not list bloat. Total Contacts grew 38% in the same period; sends grew faster, meaning send-frequency-per-contact rose. That increases unsubscribe risk; pair with the Unsubscribe Rate card.
  4. A 30%+ MoM collapse without list shrinkage is the canary scenario. Common causes: a workflow turned off (someone disabled the welcome flow during a redesign), the Marketing Email tier hit its monthly send limit, send-from-address was unverified after a domain change, or a List-trigger workflow broke. Audit HS03 surfaces the cause.
  5. Sequence sends (1-to-1 from sales reps) do not appear here, even though they look identical to recipients. A sales team sending 4,000 sequence emails per month adds zero to this card. To see total outbound, sum this card with Sales Hub Sequence sends from the dedicated card.

Sibling cards merchants should reference together

Send volume on its own is a vanity metric. Pair it with these:
CardWhy pair it with Marketing Emails Sent
Email Open RateThe engagement view. Rising sends with falling opens is over-mailing.
Email Click RateA truer engagement signal than opens (MPP-resistant).
Email Unsubscribe RateThe cost of cadence. Sending more without earning trust pushes unsubs up; above 0.5% is the warning band.
Email Send Volume TrendDaily granularity of this card. Spots cadence patterns invisible at the 30-day rollup.
Top Emails by ClicksWhich sends earned attention. Tells you which content to repeat.
Workflow Enrolment VolumeThe workflow-driven slice. Workflow sends should grow as a share of total over time.
Email-Attributed Commerce RevenueThe revenue payoff. Cross-check with commerce platform; if sends rose and email-attributed revenue did not, the campaigns missed.
Klaviyo Total SendsIf both ESPs are connected (rare overlap), Klaviyo handles commerce subscribers and HubSpot handles CRM nurture. The two should not overlap.

Reconciling against the vendor’s own dashboard

Where to look in HubSpot: Two native views give the closest comparison:
HubSpot → Marketing → Email → Analyze (Performance tab, filter to last 30 days) HubSpot → Reports → Analytics tools → Email analytics
The Performance tab’s “Sends” column summed across all emails should match this card to within a few hundred. Why our number may legitimately differ from HubSpot’s:
ReasonDirectionWhy
Portal timezone vs UTCBoundary days offHubSpot’s analytics screens use the portal account timezone for window boundaries; Vortex IQ uses UTC by default. A US-Pacific portal will see a 7-9 hour boundary shift, which on cadence-heavy days can move the figure 1-3%.
Sync lagOurs lower for the most recent 5-15 minutesMarketing emails just sent may not be in our index yet; HubSpot’s UI updates near-instantly.
Workflow-triggered sendsEitherHubSpot’s Email Performance tab can be filtered to “Marketing emails” only, which excludes workflow sends; Vortex IQ includes both. Apply the All-emails filter for the closest match.
A/B variant countingSameBoth sides count both variants.
Sequence sendsSameExcluded on both sides.
Cross-connector reconciliation: When a merchant runs HubSpot Marketing Hub alongside a separate ESP (Klaviyo for commerce, Mailchimp legacy), each ESP’s send-volume figure is independent and they should not overlap subscribers. If they do, two compliance issues to check:
CardExpected relationshipWhat causes legitimate divergence
Klaviyo Total SendsShould target a different audience (commerce subscribers vs CRM contacts)Subscriber-list overlap means contacts are receiving emails from both ESPs, raising unsubscribe risk and complaint rate. Surface via Top Customers Without HubSpot Contact (inverse, those in commerce but not CRM).
GA4 Email channel sessionsSessions from medium=email UTMs should track HubSpot send volume directionallyUTM hygiene matters; un-tagged HubSpot links land in direct or referral, not email.

Known limitations / merchant FAQs

Why is my HubSpot send count different from my Marketing dashboard? Three usual causes: (a) timezone, HubSpot’s UI uses portal timezone, Vortex IQ uses UTC. (b) Filter scope, HubSpot’s Performance tab can be filtered to Marketing-emails-only and exclude workflow sends; this card includes both by default. (c) Sync lag, the most recent 15 minutes of sends may not be in our index yet. My send count dropped 30% MoM but my list size is the same, what happened? Audit HS03 fires precisely on this scenario. Common causes: (a) a workflow turned off (someone disabled the welcome flow during a redesign), (b) the Marketing-Hub send-quota tier was hit, (c) send-from-address was unverified after a domain change, (d) a list-trigger broke (deleted property, missing list), (e) IP-warming pause (new dedicated IP). Audit HS03 surfaces the cause within 24 hours. Does this include Sales Hub Sequence emails? No. Sales Hub Sequence sends are 1-to-1 outreach (mostly looks-like-Gmail emails from rep accounts) and do not flow through Marketing Hub. They are tracked separately. To see total outbound add Sequence sends from the Sales Hub card. Why are A/B test variants both counted? Because each variant is a real send to a real recipient. A 10,000-recipient test split 50/50 sends 10,000 emails. Counting half would understate. The HubSpot Performance tab counts the same way. List-membership refresh lag, does it affect this? Active list memberships are evaluated on a 15-minute schedule. If a contact joins a list at 09:50 and the list-trigger workflow runs at 10:00, the email may not fire until the 10:15 cycle. The send count for that day is correct; just lagged by up to 15 minutes. Multi-portal aggregation, what does this show? One card per portal. Vortex IQ does not aggregate across HubSpot portals because send-quota tiers, suppression-list state, and IP reputation are per-portal. Today-volatility, why is this number jumpy intra-day? Marketing-email cadence is concentrated at certain hours (most teams send 09:00 and 14:00 portal-local time). The intra-day curve is bimodal, not smooth. The 30D rollup smooths this out. Why is my deal pipeline number different from my dashboard playbook? This is the email-sends card, not deals. They are independent metrics. Send volume rising while pipeline is flat means email is reaching new contacts but those contacts are not yet converting; check Lead-to-MQL and MQL-to-SQL rates next. Sequence enrolment vs send timing, what is the difference? Workflow enrolment is when a contact joins an automation; send timing is when the message actually fires (often 1-day or 3-day-delayed steps in the sequence). This card counts the send, not the enrolment. The Workflow Enrolment Volume card counts the enrolment.

Tracked live in Vortex IQ Nerve Centre

Marketing Emails Sent is one of hundreds of KPI pulses Vortex IQ tracks across HubSpot and 70+ other ecommerce connectors. Nerve Centre runs the detection layer; Vortex Mind investigates the cause when something moves; Ask Viq lets you interrogate any number in plain English. Start for free or book a demo to see this metric running on your own data.