At a glance
Revenue at Risk (live) is a single dollar estimate that rolls your most pressing Target Plus operational alerts into one money figure leadership can act on. It combines rejected-listing velocity multiplied by average selling price, the partner-review impact of SLA breaches, and the visibility loss from brand-compliance-flagged SKUs. On a curated, invite-only marketplace where sustained issues can cost partner status, this card translates scattered red flags into the one number an owner or finance lead actually steers by.
| What it counts | A live dollar estimate of revenue exposed by rejected listings, SLA breaches, and brand-compliance-flagged SKUs. |
| Sample type | Backend API data from Target Plus, refreshed on the standard data refresh. |
| Why it matters | It converts operational alerts that owners might otherwise ignore into a money figure, making the cost of inaction explicit. |
| Reading the value | Treat any figure above zero as exposure to recover; the higher it climbs, the more urgent the underlying alerts. |
| Currency | currency |
| Time window | RT |
| Alert trigger | >$0 |
| Sentiment key | tgt_revenue_at_risk |
| Roles | owner, finance |
Calculation
Vortex IQ builds this estimate live from three components: the rate of rejected listings multiplied by their average selling price, an estimated revenue impact of on-time-dispatch SLA breaches that put partner status under review, and the visibility loss attributed to SKUs carrying brand-presentation compliance flags. The components are summed into one figure that moves as the underlying alerts change. It is an estimate, not a booked loss, so it is best read as a directional signal of exposure. See the worked example for how this reads on a typical partner.Worked example
A representative reading of Revenue at Risk (live) for a typical Target Plus partner. On 20 Jun 26 an apparel partner’s card reads about 9,000 from 30 rejected listings at an average selling price near 3,500 attributed to an on-time dispatch rate that has slipped under the SLA and is drawing partner-review attention, and around $1,500 of visibility loss from a dozen SKUs flagged for non-compliant imagery. Rather than reading three separate amber cards, leadership sees one figure and prioritises the rejected listings first because they carry the largest share. Vortex Mind traces each slice back to its root alert, and Ask Viq answers “what is the biggest driver of my revenue at risk right now” in plain English so the finance lead can decide where to put effort.Sibling cards merchants should reference together
| Card | Why merchants reach for it |
|---|---|
target-plus-partner-health-score | The composite standing this card’s SLA component feeds into. |
rejected-listings-mirakl-import-errors | The largest typical driver: SKUs off the storefront due to import errors. |
on-time-dispatch-rate-partner-sla | The SLA component that contributes the partner-review portion of the estimate. |
brand-presentation-compliance-flags | The visibility-loss component from non-compliant listings. |
active-target-plus-listings-for-oos-skus-on-bc | Surfaces stock mismatches that can turn into cancellations and further risk. |
Reconciling against Target Plus Partners
Where to look in the Target Plus Partners portal: There is no direct equivalent figure in the portal because this is a Vortex IQ composite estimate. Validate its inputs instead: the partner scorecard for SLA standing, the Mirakl feed import logs for rejected listings, and the listing status views for compliance-flagged SKUs. Why the Vortex IQ value may legitimately differ:| Reason | Direction | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Period boundary | Either | The estimate is live and recomputes as alerts change; a portal report captured earlier reflects a different moment. |
| Time zone | Either | SLA and dispatch windows use Target’s reference time zone, which shifts which breaches are counted at the boundary. |
| Filter scope | Vortex IQ may show more | The card aggregates risk across all three input types; any single portal report covers only one of them. |