At a glance
Klarna’s mean order value in the period. Klarna AOV is structurally 30 to 45% higher than card AOV because customers feel comfortable buying larger baskets when payments are spread. The single most important commercial metric for justifying Klarna’s higher merchant fee.
Calculation
Calculated automatically from your Klarna data. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.Worked example
“Helle Mode”, 30 days ending 02 May 26.
Helle Mode’s card AOV (Stripe) for the same period is EUR 102. Klarna AOV is 47% higher. That’s the “Klarna lift” justifying the 3.5% merchant fee vs 2.0% card fee.
What the merchant should notice:
- Slice it AOV at EUR 575 dominates the blended figure. Slice it is 4.6% of count but 17.6% of volume; including it lifts the blended AOV by 15-20%.
- Pay in 4 AOV (EUR 135) marginally higher than Pay in 30 (EUR 127). Pay in 4 customers know they’re spreading; basket sizes lift slightly.
- A 10% drop in blended AOV likely means Slice it adoption dropped. Slice it requires a credit check; if the customer-facing UX deteriorates (a checkout-page redesign mistake), Slice it conversion drops sharply.
- The Klarna AOV lift is the commercial justification. A 47% AOV lift on 35% of orders translates roughly to 16% revenue uplift attributable to Klarna integration; well above the 1.5pp incremental fee cost.
Sibling cards merchants should reference together
Reconciling against the vendor’s own dashboard
Where to look: portal.klarna.com → Reports → Sales with average-order-value computed (volume divided by count) per period. Why our number may differ:
Cross-connector reconciliation: